would you like to biggie size that?

it's a question asked around the world every day... and the answer is a resounding yes... yes ... YES! yes, virginia, size does matter. it's not that i don't think stamina is a nice quality... of course it is. who doesn't like stamina? but the fact remains that when all is said and done, size is king. (because let's face it, when it's over, it's over and stamina no longer matters... yet size is there, and you can't ignore it.) let's face it, size is hugely popular. (yeah i know, that was bad, but i couldn't help it.)

now, i could sit here and type all day about specific instances of size brutally bludgeoning stamina, or about my own personal observations and experiences. but i don't even need to do that. we're going to take this on over to the cage and let size and stamina duke it out the way nature intended. stamina may be over here, and then over there, jumping around like a flea with its boundless energy -- but size is here and there... it's everywhere. in fact, size is so overpowering it wins just by showing up. even with the trend of streamlining and simplification where some may claim "less is more!", really... most of the time, less is just... well, less. (as a side note, i'm actually inclined to feel sorry for stamina... it's not really an even match here. it's the consolation prize... always used defensively, as in 'yeah but i've got staying power'. uh. yeah. i never really bought that as a valid rebuttal, and i don't think you do either.)

you can use the drum-beating bunny argument alll you want and say "yeah, but stamina keeps on going, and going, and going", but i'm not talking about needing batteries here, ladies. the fact is, sure, a faucet can drip all night, but it's no match for a tidal wave.

to sum it up: yes, bigger is most certainly better, as sir mixalot proved in his groundbreaking dissertation, baby got back. "omigod. it's. so. big." amen, i say, and thank the lord!